![uad la2a uad la2a](https://c1.zzounds.com/media/productmedia/fit,2018by3200/quality,85/LA-2A_R3qtr_hq_clipped-d0fafd9f4d753836c875fd83a81833e9.jpg)
I am still using 6.4 only because I did not seen a need to upgrade to 6.5. Whew.thankfully! :)Įxcellent news for you! You have been through an ordeal with this.
UAD LA2A 32 BIT
Whatever they did, I have no problems at all with Sonar 8.5, X1 or X2 using 32 bit and 64 plugs and programs. I noticed UAD mentioned something in their notes about a DSP overload in Sonar or something. This new 6.5 fixed all my UAD issues you guys may have seen me report on with the 6.4 version. I was surprised to hear the 7802 had so alot of tonality. Hardware always sound great and give you unique tonality. I've changed out the wav files for the hardware comps, so if you already got them it you probably want to D/L them again.
![uad la2a uad la2a](https://www.kmraudio.com/media/catalog/product/cache/dc3c78d248ef9ccec159fea745843881/l/a/la2a.jpg)
ONE MORE EDIT - realized I had fouled up some hardware settings on the hardware versions. If anyone is interested you can find it here.īTW, I got pretty close with the levels but you may need to adjust a bit to avoid F-M type problems.ĮDIT - one more thing, each compressor was set so that it was compressing to about 5.5 db of GR. I've done that with the new UA LA2A stuff along with LA2A clones from IK, NI, Cakewalk and some hardware that says they do similar things (in this case, a Distressor set to their LA-2A type settings, and Chameleon labs 7802 and a Summit TLA-100A). This let's me loop up a region and just play them back one by one to really try and spot differences. If anyone is interested, one of the things I frequently do when I get a new peice of kit is make a bunch of comparisons to other pieces like it.